Violent Minds

How Their Psychology Differs From Males

When most people think of serial killers, they imagine men-Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy. This perception isn’t surprising: approximately 85-90% of serial killers are male. However, the remaining 10-15% who are female represent a fascinating and deeply different psychological profile. Female serial killers operate under different motivations, use different methods, select different victims, and exhibit distinct psychological patterns that challenge our assumptions about serial murder. This comprehensive analysis examines exactly how female serial killers differ from their male counterparts-and why understanding these differences matters.

The Fundamental Difference: Hunter vs. Gatherer

The Core Distinction

Perhaps the most striking difference between male and female serial killers lies in how they approach their victims-a distinction researchers call the “hunter-gatherer hypothesis”.

Male serial killers: HUNT

• Actively stalk and pursue victims
• Typically target strangers (almost 6 times more likely than women)
• Kill outside their immediate circle
• 65.4% engage in stalking behavior before killing

Female serial killers: GATHER

• Target people already in their orbit
• Nearly twice as likely to kill someone they know
• Victims are often family members, intimate partners, patients, or neighbors
• Only 3.6% engage in stalking

“Male serial killers tend to ‘hunt’ their victims, who are often strangers to them,” explains researcher Marissa Harrison. “Female serial killers tend to ‘gather’ their victims-targeting people around them who they may already know, often for financial gain”.

This pattern aligns with evolutionary psychology theories about traditional gender roles. Just as ancestral men hunted game while women gathered resources near the camp, modern serial killers appear to follow similar patterns in their predatory behavior.

Motivation: The Driving Force Behind Murder

The Gender Divide in Motives

The single most important difference between male and female serial killers lies in their motivations.

Male Serial Killers:

• Primary motive: Sexual gratification and control (even if not explicitly sexual, there’s typically a sexual psychological component)
• Driven by compulsion and innate urges
• Often describe feeling “compelled” to kill
• The victim’s specific identity frequently doesn’t matter-they’re interchangeable objects satisfying a compulsion

Female Serial Killers:

• Primary motive: Financial gain (the #1 driver)
• Secondary motive: Power and control (closely related to money)
• Pragmatic and calculated-there’s usually “a reason”
• Kill to improve their lifestyle, eliminate obstacles, or gain resources

“The single biggest driver for male serial killers is sexual compulsion,” notes one analysis. “Compare that to female serial killers and we see a polar opposite. When a woman kills, there’s usually ‘a reason.’ There’s pragmatism and justification (at least in the killer’s mind, anyway)”.

The Breakdown of Female Serial Killer Motives:

• Hedonistic (financial gain, lust, thrill): 48.5%
• Power-seeking (killing those in their care): Common secondary motive
• Revenge: Increasingly common (now 50% of cases in the last decade)
• Attention/sympathy: Munchausen by proxy and similar disorders

Interestingly, some female serial killers kill close family members (like children) to garner sympathy and attention from friends, family, and the wider community-a motive exceptionally rare among male killers.

Methods: How They Kill

The Stark Contrast in Murder Methods

The methods employed by female versus male serial killers reflect both practical and psychological differences.

Female Serial Killers:

• Primary method: Poison (most common)
• Also: Suffocation, drowning, drug overdoses
• Subtlety and cunning over brute force
• Less violent, cleaner methods
• Create less physical evidence

Male Serial Killers:

• Primary method: Asphyxiation (strangulation, suffocation)
• Also: Shooting, stabbing, bludgeoning, beating
• Brute force and direct violence
• Often involves torture and prolonged suffering
• Sexually sadistic elements common

Why the Difference?

Practical explanation: Methods like strangling or beating require physical strength-an area where men generally have an advantage. Women may choose poison or suffocation because these methods are more accessible given typical strength differentials.

Psychological explanation: Women killers appear more inclined toward subtlety and cunning. The more violent a murder, the more evidence created and the greater chance of getting caught. Poison allows the death to potentially appear natural, giving the killer time to collect insurance money or inheritance before suspicion arises.

Evolutionary explanation: These methods align with traditional “feminine” approaches-indirect, patient, requiring planning rather than immediate physical confrontation.

Victim Selection: Who They Target

Demographics and Relationships

Female serial killers demonstrate markedly different victim selection patterns:

Most Common Victims:

• Spouses and intimate partners (nearly twice as likely as males to kill partners)
• Elderly people in their care
• Ill or vulnerable patients (if working in healthcare)
• Children (including their own)
• Family members

Victim Vulnerability: Female serial killers overwhelmingly target the vulnerable-those who cannot easily fight back or who depend on the killer for care. This includes elderly patients, sick individuals, young children, and disabled persons.

The “Caretaker” Pattern: Many female serial killers worked in stereotypically female professions, particularly nursing and babysitting. This provided both access to vulnerable victims and trust that could be exploited.

Physical Attractiveness: Research found female serial killers tended to be above average in physical attractiveness, which may have helped engender trust in victims.

Psychological Profiles and Mental Health

Mental Illness and Personality Disorders

While both male and female serial killers show elevated rates of mental illness, the specific disorders differ:

Common in Female Serial Killers:

• Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD): Particularly in cases involving emotional instability and impulsive violence
• Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD): Though less common than in males (21% of female inmates vs. 47% of male inmates)
• Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: Especially in “Angel of Death” nurses
• Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Particularly those with severe abuse histories
• Postpartum psychosis: In filicide cases involving multiple children

The Case of Aileen Wuornos: An Exception

Aileen Wuornos represents a fascinating exception to typical female serial killer patterns. Unlike most female serial killers who:

• Use poison → Wuornos used a gun
• Kill people they know → Wuornos killed strangers
• Kill for money primarily → Wuornos killed for survival/self-defense (her claim)

Forensic analysis suggests Wuornos exhibited Borderline Personality Disorder and PTSD more than pure psychopathy:

BPD/PTSD Traits	Wuornos’ Behavior
Fear of abandonment	Chaotic relationships; desperate for love and security
Unstable self-image	Saw herself as both victim and dangerous woman
Impulsive behavior	Killings were spur-of-the-moment, not premeditated
Emotional instability	Frequent mood swings and bursts of rage
Trauma reactivity	Hypervigilance and violent responses to perceived threats

Unlike Ted Bundy’s cold, calculated manipulation, Wuornos was emotionally volatile, angry, and impulsive rather than charming and strategic. Her case supports feminist criminology theories emphasizing the role of trauma and gender in criminal behavior.

Childhood Trauma Patterns:

Research on female serial killers found:

• Presence of early childhood trauma: Very common
• Antisocial behavior patterns emerging early
• Sexual deviance (though less common than in males)
• Romantic instability: Particularly in team killers
• History of physical or sexual abuse: Higher than general population
• Substance abuse problems: Common
• Mental illness diagnosis or signs: Frequent

Typologies: Categories of Female Serial Killers

The Major Classifications

Researchers have identified several distinct types of female serial killers:

1. Black Widows

The most common type-women who kill multiple spouses, partners, or family members for financial gain.

Characteristics:

• Target husbands, boyfriends, or family members
• Primary motive: Life insurance money, inheritance, property
• Method: Usually poison (arsenic historically, though modern killers use prescription drugs)
• Pattern: Multiple “accidental” deaths of partners over time

Case Example: Chisako Kakehi – Japan’s “Black Widow”

• Killed 3 romantic partners between ages 61-68
• Used cyanide poison disguised as health supplements
• Met victims through matchmaking services
• Accumulated $145,000 to $7.3 million from victims’ estates
• Currently on death row at age 74

Case Example: Judy Buenoano – Florida’s “Black Widow”

• Killed her husband, son, and boyfriend
• Motivated by greed and insurance money
• Used poison and staged accidents
• Executed in Florida’s electric chair in 1998

2. Angels of Death

Healthcare workers (usually nurses) who kill patients in their care.

Characteristics:

• Work in hospitals, nursing homes, or care facilities
• Victims are patients-often vulnerable or elderly
• Motives vary: attention-seeking, power, playing “God,” Munchausen by proxy
• Method: Lethal injections, medication overdoses, turning off life support
• Often create medical crises they can then “heroically” resolve

Case Example: Charles Cullen (male exception)

• Critical care nurse who killed up to 40 patients (possibly many more)
• Operated across 7 different hospitals over 16 years
• Used digoxin and other lethal drugs
• Hospitals suspected him but didn’t report to subsequent employers
• Represents failure of medical institutions to protect patients

Case Example: Genene Jones

• Pediatric nurse in Texas
• Killed dozens of infants and children in the 1970s-80s
• Infant death rates rose dramatically wherever she worked
• Used succinylcholine injections to induce cardiac arrest
• Hospitals covered up suspicions to avoid lawsuits
• Diagnosed with Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy

Case Example: Beverley Allitt – UK “Angel of Death”

• Killed 4 children (ages 7 weeks to 11 years)
• Injured many more with insulin and potassium overdoses
• Parents of victims asked her to be godmother-then she harmed their other child
• Diagnosed with Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy

3. Profit/Crime-Based Killers

Women who kill as part of organized crime operations or personal scams.

Case Example: Helen Golay and Olga Rutterschmidt – “Black Widow Murders”

• Targeted homeless men
• Took out life insurance policies on victims
• Murdered them within 2 years (insurance requirement)
• Accumulated substantial money from multiple victims
• Both sentenced to life without parole

4. Team Killers

Women who kill alongside a male partner.

Key Finding: Three female serial killers examined in one study had maintained violence-free lives until they met their male partners. Their partners persuaded them to kill, and the women felt a desire to keep that relationship at all costs.

Characteristics:

• Women were gender-socialized to prioritize relationships
• Team disintegration often occurred before capture
• Women typically played subordinate roles initially
• Some eventually became autonomous killers

5. Revenge Killers

Women motivated primarily by anger, betrayal, or perceived wrongs.

Rising Trend: Research shows a notable rise in revenge-driven murders among female serial killers over the last decade, now constituting 50% of such cases.

The “Masculine” Female Serial Killer

When Women Kill Like Men

Research on masculine traits in female serial killers identified cases where women exhibited traditionally male patterns:

Masculine Traits Studied:

• Lack of emotions
• Aggression
• Control
• Dominance
• Manipulation

Key Findings:

• Aggressive and controlling traits were notably linked to killers’ motives and methods
• Female serial killers driven by need for control or power manifest violent tendencies toward those viewed as weak, vulnerable, or dependent
• These killers exhibited violent tendencies rather than the subtlety typical of female murderers
• Childhood trauma and early observation of gender roles shaped their development

Thematic Analysis Generated 6 Themes:

1. Trauma
2. No trauma
3. Early observation of gender roles
4. Calm demeanor
5. Violent tendencies
6. Homicidal behavior

This research challenges stereotypes about “passive-nurturing” female behavior, revealing that some women serial killers exhibit traditionally masculine psychological patterns.

Sexual Violence and Deviance

A Critical Difference

One of the most striking contrasts between male and female serial killers is the relative absence of sexual violence and deviance in female cases.

Male Serial Killers:

• Sexual motivation extremely common
• Frequent rape, sexual torture, necrophilia
• Victims often sexually assaulted before or after death
• Sexual sadism as driving force

Female Serial Killers:

• Sexual violence very rare
• When present, usually involved male co-offenders
• Two exceptions in one large study-both had men involved in those crimes
• Murders typically “clean” without sexual elements

This absence reinforces the fundamental motivational difference: males kill for sexual gratification and control, while females kill for financial gain and practical reasons.

Filicide: When Mothers Kill Their Children

Postpartum Psychosis and Mental Illness

Female serial killers who target their own children represent a particularly tragic category, often involving severe mental illness.

The Andrea Yates Case

• Drowned all 5 of her children in their bathtub (June 2001)
• Suffered from severe postpartum depression, postpartum psychosis, and schizophrenia
• Believed Satan wanted her to kill her children
• Thought her children would “never be right” due to her “defective mothering”
• Believed they would “burn in hell” unless she killed them while still “innocent”
• Wanted to “save their souls” through murder
• Had been hospitalized 4 times before the killings
• Did not reveal psychotic symptoms to husband or doctor

Postpartum Psychosis Statistics:

• Occurs in 1 per 1,000 births
• Women are up to 25 times more likely to become psychotic in the month following childbirth
• Untreated postpartum psychosis carries an estimated 4% risk of infanticide
• Also carries a 5% suicide risk
• 72% of mothers with postpartum psychosis have bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder
• Relapse rate approaches 80% in subsequent pregnancies

Resnick’s Filicide Categories:

1. Altruistic filicide: Killing to save child from perceived worse fate (Andrea Yates)
2. Acutely psychotic filicide: No comprehensible motive; command hallucinations
3. Unwanted child filicide: Killing children seen as hindrances
4. Accidental filicide: Result of abuse or neglect
5. Spouse revenge filicide: Killing children to wound the other parent

Detection and Capture: Why Female Serial Killers Often Evade Justice Longer

The “Invisible” Killers

Female serial killers typically operate longer before detection than their male counterparts:

Reasons for Extended Operations:

1. Method allows natural-appearing deaths: Poison can mimic natural illness or heart attacks, especially in elderly or already-ill victims

2. Trusted positions: Nurses, caretakers, wives-roles associated with caring, not killing

3. Gender bias: Society doesn’t suspect women of serial murder as readily

4. Institutional failure: Hospitals often cover up suspicious deaths rather than report them, fearing lawsuits and reputation damage

5. Targeting vulnerable populations: Deaths of elderly or ill patients raise less suspicion

The Charles Cullen Case as Example:

• Killed across 16 years in 7 different hospitals
• Suspicions at nearly all of them that he was harming patients
• None passed information to subsequent employers
• Fired or forced to resign from 5 hospitals before final capture
• No consequences or police involvement until the very end
• Killed 13 more people at final hospital before arrest

This pattern of institutional protection isn’t unique-it appears repeatedly in “Angel of Death” cases.

The Evolving Pattern: Changes Over Time

Shifting Gender Norms and Killing Patterns

Fascinating research suggests female serial killer patterns may evolve with changing gender norms.

Historical Context:

• Before the 1900s, serial killers were approximately 50-50 female and male
• Women often killed using poison, which was accessible and hard to detect
• As forensic science improved, poison became easier to detect
• Female serial killers became less common relative to males

Modern Shifts:

• Gender norms for women have dramatically changed over three waves of feminism
• Research suggests patterns of female serial killers may change to reflect femininity ideals of their time
• Revenge-driven murders have increased dramatically (now 50% of cases)
• Some female killers now exhibit more “masculine” traits (aggression, control)

The Hypothesis: As women’s social roles expand and gender norms shift, the psychology and methods of female serial killers may also evolve to reflect these changes.

Why Understanding These Differences Matters

Practical Implications

Understanding how female serial killers differ from males has critical real-world applications:

1. Criminal Investigation:

• When looking at a crime scene, investigators should be able to distinguish gender fairly quickly based on victim relationship, method, and motive
• Different investigative strategies needed for “hunters” vs. “gatherers”

2. Prevention and Detection:

• Healthcare facilities need better systems to detect “Angels of Death”
• Banks and insurance companies should flag multiple suspicious deaths with one beneficiary
• Family members should be aware of sudden pattern changes in caregiver behavior

3. Victim Protection:

• Vulnerable populations (elderly, ill, children) need stronger protections
• Whistleblower protections for healthcare workers who report suspicious deaths
• Mandatory reporting requirements when medical professionals are fired for suspected harm

4. Mental Health Intervention:

• Postpartum psychosis screening and treatment to prevent filicide
• Early intervention for women showing concerning patterns

5. Challenging Assumptions:

• Serial killers aren’t all male
• Women can be just as deadly-just different in methodology
• Caring professions can provide cover for predatory behavior

Conclusion: Two Sides of the Same Dark Coin

Female serial killers represent approximately 10-15% of all serial killers, but their psychology differs profoundly from their male counterparts. While both engage in repetitive, premeditated murder, nearly everything else diverges:

Males hunt strangers, driven by sexual compulsion and sadistic urges, using violent hands-on methods, operating as lone wolves controlled by dark fantasies.

Females gather victims from their immediate circle, driven by financial gain and practical motives, using subtle methods like poison, often working in caring professions or targeting family members.

Where male serial killers are compulsive and sexual, female serial killers are calculated and pragmatic.

Where males leave violent, evidence-rich crime scenes, females create clean, suspicious-death scenarios.

Where males stalk and pursue, females wait and exploit.

These aren’t absolute rules-Aileen Wuornos killed like a male serial killer, using a gun on strangers. Some “Angels of Death” kill for the psychological thrill of playing God rather than money. But the general patterns hold across hundreds of cases.

Understanding these differences isn’t academic-it saves lives. When hospitals ignore suspicious death patterns around specific nurses, more patients die. When insurance companies don’t flag multiple policy payouts to the same beneficiary, more “Black Widows” collect. When society assumes women can’t be serial killers, the victims pile up invisibly.

Female serial killers are rare, but they’re just as deadly as males-sometimes more so, precisely because their methods allow them to kill for years before detection. By understanding the distinct psychology of female serial killers, we can better identify, investigate, and ultimately prevent these devastating crimes.

The fundamental lesson: serial killing transcends gender, but it manifests very differently based on evolved psychological patterns, social conditioning, and practical considerations. Women can be monsters too-they just express their monstrosity differently.

• Book of the Year

•